After the
institution of proceedings my client married his fiancé. I prepared and
submitted the immigrant visa petition on his behalf, together with proof that
the marriage was entered into for the right reasons, and obtained adjournments
of the deportation proceedings in order to buy time to get the Green Card petition
approved.
Upon
approval of his wife’s petition I filed a motion to dismissal to enable my client to apply for his Green Card before USCIS rather than before the immigration
court. This motion was granted, and I then filed my client’s Green Card application
with the New York
district office, which had jurisdiction over his place of residence.
At the scheduled
marriage fraud interview my client was told that he needed a waiver to
overcome inadmissibility. USCIS mistakenly
believed that he triggered a 10 year bar when he physically left U.S. soil without being admitted into Canada . We received instructions from USCIS to file
the I-601
within 30 days of receipt of the notice.
I successfully argued that a waiver was unnecessary because when encountered he was
not an applicant for admission because he never effectuated a departure from
the United States , making a
u-turn on the bridge prior to ever leaving U.S. territory. As such, he did not trigger either a 3 or 10
year bar under INA §§ 212(a)(9)(B)(i)(I) and (II), which would necessitate a
waiver of inadmissibility.
USCIS
agreed with my interpretation of the law, reversed their initial decision, and
issued my client’s Green Card.
He will be eligible to apply for his citizenship in three years.
He will be eligible to apply for his citizenship in three years.
No comments:
Post a Comment